White House pushes for Iran filibuster

The administration seeks to tamp down expectations, but the numbers of supportive Senate Democrats are adding up. Politico.com By Edward-Isaac Dovere and Burgess Everett 8/27/15 President Barack Obama’s almost certain to get the Iran nuclear deal — but whether he gets there by filibuster or sustained veto could make all the difference. A Democratic filibuster in the Senate would be a clear victory for the president, allowing Obama to say that for all the political noise there wasn’t enough actual opposition to the nuclear agreement with the Islamic republic to … Continue reading

Iran deal increases risk of war

Philly.com By Brendan F. Boyle 8/23/15 The coming congressional vote on the Iran nuclear agreement has been called the most important foreign policy vote since the Iraq War. As such, partisan politics have no place when it comes to the national security of the United States. As a member of both the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Middle East subcommittee, I have participated in numerous hearings and attended classified briefings on this complex issue, including meeting with President Obama in the White House Situation Room. While I greatly admire … Continue reading

(Iran:) The worst agreement in U.S. diplomatic history

The Washington Post By Charles Krauthammer 7/2/15 The devil is not in the details. It’s in the entire conception of the Iran deal, animated by President Obama’s fantastical belief that he, uniquely, could achieve detente with a fanatical Islamist regime whose foundational purpose is to cleanse the Middle East of the poisonous corruption of American power and influence. In pursuit of his desire to make the Islamic Republic into an accepted, normalized “successful regional power,” Obama decided to take over the nuclear negotiations. At the time, Tehran was reeling — … Continue reading

Could Obama Have Made a ‘Better Deal’ With Iran?

NYmag.com By Jonathan Chait 7/30/15 Neoconservative éminence grise Norman Podhoretz has been arguing for many years that bombing Iran is the only way to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. He made the case privately and publicly, and kept it up. And Podhoretz continues to believe that a military attack is the only way to stop a nuclear Iran. He made the case again in an op-ed yesterday. Podhoretz’s argument is notable because it places him, in a sense, on the side of President Obama, and against virtually all the right. … Continue reading

My phone call from “Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran”

By Russ Phillips

Yesterday I received a phone call from “Citizens for a Nuclear Free Iran” (CNFI) and was asked, “Do you trust Iran to live up to the agreement?”

The caller said he would report my answer to my Senator, Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) and then corrected himself and said Senator Joe Donnelly (IN). He did not mention Senator Dan Coats (IN), I assume, because he has already announced his opposition to the Iran Deal. I informed the caller I was very familiar with contacting my congressman and would register my sentiments directly to them.

Instead of answering the question, I asked several of my own. I wanted to know more about this advocacy group. After several of my questions the caller ended the conversation, still without my answer.

To help me be more informed about the issues on this topic I began some online research.

CNFI is “…dedicated to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapons capability.” (Source)

 Evan Bayh, previously governor of Indiana and served two terms in the U.S. Senate, serves on the CNFI Advisory Board. (Source)

A recent Washington Post article, “Anti-Iran deal groups firing on all cylinders in massive lobbying push,” helps to understand the effort underway to undermine the Iran Deal.

The Historic Deal that Will Prevent Iran from Acquiring A Nuclear Weapon,” as presented by the White House and including a video (4:37) by President Obama addresses some of the most common criticisms of the Iran Deal.

For anyone seriously interested in this matter this is just a start. Best wishes in your journey of discovery.

Obama Makes His Case on Iran Nuclear Deal

The New York Times By Thomas L. Friedman 7/14/15 Only hours after the conclusion of an agreement with Iran to lift oil and financial sanctions in return for curbs on Iran’s nuclear capabilities, President Obama is a man who evinces no second thoughts whatsoever about the deal he struck. In a 45-minute interview in the Cabinet Room, the president kept stressing one argument: Don’t judge me on whether this deal transforms Iran, ends Iran’s aggressive behavior toward some of its Arab neighbors or leads to détente between Shiites and Sunnis. … Continue reading

Indiana’s Stutzman announces bid for Senate

Stutzman announces bid for Senate The Journal Gazette (Ft. Wayne, IN) By Brian Francisco, Washington editor 5/9/15 ROANOKE – U.S. Rep. Marlin Stutzman announced Saturday he will run for a Senate seat next year, and he left no doubt about where he fits on the political spectrum. “I will never apologize for being God-fearing, gun-packing, commonsense conservative,” he told hundreds of supporters at his campaign kick-off rally. Stutzman, R-3rd, criticized the Obama administration for half of the $18 trillion national debt, the federal health care law and government regulations he … Continue reading

Readers React to Republicans’ Letter to Iran

The New York Times
By Nancy Wartik

An arcane, never-applied law, passed in 1799, was on many New York Times readers’ minds when they commented on a March 9 story about the 47 Republican senators who published an “open letter” addressed to the “Leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

An article by the reporter Peter Baker described the letter, written by Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, as a “rare direct congressional intervention into diplomatic negotiations.” The communiqué trumpeted to the leaders that any nuclear agreement reached with the Obama administration during the current negotiations could be undone “with the stroke of a pen” by the next president.

Among the more than 3,500 reader comments that came in (minus 1,000 that weren’t publishable), was this one…
Continue reading

Opinion: War with Iran is probably our best option


The Washington Post
By Joshua Muravchik

Joshua Muravchik is a fellow at the Foreign Policy Institute of Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies.

The logical flaw in the indictment of a looming “very bad” nuclear deal with Iran that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered before Congress this month was his claim that we could secure a “good deal” by calling Iran’s bluff and imposing tougher sanctions. The Iranian regime that Netanyahu described so vividly — violent, rapacious, devious and redolent with hatred for Israel and the United States — is bound to continue its quest for nuclear weapons by refusing any “good deal” or by cheating…
Continue reading

Foreign Policy: Israel, Netanyahu, Iran, Nuclear Deal, Congress, Obama

The U.S. is in the midst of negotiating an Iran nuclear deal. In recent days there have been several related developments. Several snippets of information follow with links for more extensive reading.

*Israel remains the leading recipient of U.S. foreign military financing (FMF), receiving over $20.5 billion since 2009. The United States in Fiscal Year 2014 provided Israel with more security assistance funding than ever before. In Fiscal Year 2016, which marks the eighth year of a 10-year, $30 billion Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. and Israel, we have asked Congress for $3.1 billion in FMF funds for Israel. (Source: “5 Things You Need to Know About the U.S.-Israel Relationship Under President Obama,” National Security Council)

*Secretary of State John Kerry on Wednesday [February 25, 2015] declined to “get into” what negotiators are proposing to the Iranians in the nuclear talks, and defended the president’s authority to execute foreign policy, saying he did not believe a negotiated agreement should go through a “formal approval process” by Congress. (Source: “Kerry: Congress Has No Role in Approving Iran Nuclear Deal,” CNSNews.com)

*In an interview with Reuters on Monday [March 2, 2015], President Barack Obama said Iran should commit to a verifiable freeze of at least 10 years in its nuclear activity as part of any final agreement. “If, in fact, Iran is willing to agree to double-digit years of keeping their program where it is right now and, in fact, rolling back elements of it that currently exist … if we’ve got that, and we’ve got a way of verifying that, there’s no other steps we can take that would give us such assurance that they don’t have a nuclear weapon,” Obama said. (Source: “What’s in the Iran nuclear deal,” CNN.com)

*WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) introduced bipartisan legislation requiring congressional review of any comprehensive nuclear agreement with Iran. The Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 would mandate the president submit the text of any agreement to Congress and prohibit the administration from suspending congressional sanctions for 60 days. During that period, Congress would have the opportunity to hold hearings and approve, disapprove or take no action on the agreement. (Source: “Corker, Menendez, Graham, Kaine Introduce Bipartisan Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015,” U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke to Congress Tuesday [March 3, 2015] about the emerging nuclear deal with Iran. Here is the full transcript: (Source: “Transcript: Netanyahu Speech to Congress,” Time.com)